HP3000-L Archives

February 2002, Week 4

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: evolution vs 'oldest' equipment
From:
Roy Brown <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Roy Brown <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 27 Feb 2002 17:32:58 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines) 
In message <[log in to unmask]>, Kim Borgman
<[log in to unmask]> writes
>Which is worse ?
>
>Endless messages about who has the oldest piece of equipment....... or
>messages addressing the validity of evolution ?
>
>Someone explain to me how either relate to keeping our current 3K
>running........

If stuff 25 years old is still running, it gives you some idea how long
you've got after HP turn off the supply of new hardware.....

>  Or keeping the 3K in existance...

It tells you you have to evolve or die....


--
Roy Brown        'Have nothing in your houses that you do not know to be
Kelmscott Ltd     useful, or believe to be beautiful'  William Morris

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2