HP3000-L Archives

February 2002, Week 4

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: evolution vs 'oldest' equipment
From:
Larry Barnes <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Larry Barnes <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 27 Feb 2002 14:20:54 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines) 
Evolution is the backbone of the HP3k.  That's what made it so reliable.  It
didn't migrate to some new environment because this rage was 'NEW' and
'BETTER'.

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Berkowitz [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 1:38 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [HP3000-L] evolution vs 'oldest' equipment


Kim Borgman writes


Which is worse ?

Endless messages about who has the oldest piece of equipment....... or
messages addressing the validity of evolution ?

Someone explain to me how either relate to keeping our current 3K
running........  Or keeping the 3K in existance...

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2