Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 20 Feb 2002 22:02:15 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Thus it was written in the epistle of Roy Brown,
>
> And you believed what was clearly an outbreak of hysteresis?
That isn't catching is it? It sounds like the sort of where once you catch it,
you're never quite the same afterward.
Ted
--
Ted Ashton ([log in to unmask]), Info Sys, Southern Adventist University
==========================================================
The mathematician may be compared to a designer of garments, who is utterly
oblivious of the creatures whom his garments may fit. To be sure, his art
originated in the necessity for clothing such creatures, but this was long
ago; to this day a shape will occasionally appear which will fit into the
garment as if the garment had been made for it. Then there is no end of
surprise and delight.
-- Dantzig
==========================================================
Deep thought to be found at http://www.southern.edu/~ashted
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
|
|
|