Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sat, 2 Feb 2002 10:41:34 +1100 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Friday, February 01, 2002 7:45 PM, Brad Stambaugh wrote:
(snip)
>It seems to me that
> Scuba Pro Jet fins could be very popular if they made them with a good
> foot pocket. I think most people agree that they hurt. The instep is too
> low. The sole should be extended. The material should be more flexible
> (but not in the blade). Does any one agree? It would be my choice in
> fins.
I've never been that aware of - or experienced noticeable discomfort - from
the Jet fins foot pocket. But certainly in comparison, say, with the Twin
Jets there's a heap of difference. The Twin Jets have a foot pocket that's
possibly the most comfortable - for me - that I've ever worn. I also liked
the extended sole. (Something, by the way, that did entail a little more
care when putting them on in order to make sure the fin strap didn't get
caught!) :-)
> The patent has expired on these fins, and someone could probably make
> some money if they updated the foot pocket.
And added spring straps. Surely one of the best - and easiest to use - fin
retaining systems ever invented? :-)
> Strike, maybe you could use your influence and publishing connections to
> persuade Scuba Pro or some other manufacturer to do this.
My 'influence' with any of the diving manufacturers - or publishers - is
practically non-existent! :-)
Which is why I keep saying that I'm going to re-launch another diving mag
along the lines of 'Professional Diver Journal'. (It wouldn't give me any
more influence; just give me a self-indulgent vehicle for bringing to light
aspects of diving that I enjoy writing about!) :-)
Strike
|
|
|