Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 16 Jan 2002 09:47:04 -0600 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
This may help a little. A few years ago I transferred IMAGE database
extracts through Reflection (via WRQ protocall) to my PC. The
perfomance was a big problem. In the File Transfer screen, click the
SETUP button then select the WRQ tab. There are three transfer types
in a combo box list. One of the three types works must faster than
the other two - I can't recall which.
On Tue, 15 Jan 2002 10:17:12 -0600 (Central Standard Time), Paul
Thompson <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>Hi guys,
>
>Just recently I have noticed that when transferring files from/to our HP3000
>the number of records per second being transferred is extremely low. This
>figure fluctuates from 2,500 records to just 32!I have also seen the
>transfer stalled a couple of times.
>
>I have checked the network traffic and this is no problems there. I have
>tried Reflection 7.x and 8.x with the same effect.
>
>The only thing that has changed is that we upgraded from a 939 to a 979
>about 3 months ago - as far I can gather it is from around this time that
>the problem arose...
>
>I have tried everything I can think of - even got the latest version of
>PCLINK2 - still no joy...
>
>Any thoughts on this one?
>
>TIA
>
>Paul Thompson
>HP3000/Ecometry Analyst
>Spark Response
>Tel: 0191 4959999 ext:5416
>Emal: [log in to unmask]
>Website: www.sparkresponse.com/
>
>* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
>* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
>
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
|
|
|