I remember from the sequel film it was brought up that HAL was directed to
not let the crew know the true reason for going to Jupiter. I think the
dialog was something like ' ... HAL was told to lie by people who find it easy
to lie and this was in direct contradiction to HAL's basic programming of
accurate processing of data...'.
------------------( Forwarded letter 1 follows )---------------------
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 13:09:39 -0800
To: [log in to unmask]
From: Art.Bahrs[abahrs]@DENKOR.COM
Sender: [log in to unmask]
Reply-To: Art.Bahrs[ABahrs]@denkor.com, [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [HP3000-L] OT: HAL-15 desktop supercomputer
Hi Wirt & Greg :)
Also writing from memory... Wasn't part of the "screw-up" related to the
contradictory directives given to HAL? HAL was told two different things
causing him to become unstable?
Knowing my memory I am probably completely off here ... again :) hehe
Art "Firewalls don't need a hearth? hehe" Bahrs
----- Original Message -----
From: "Wirt Atmar" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 12:13 PM
Subject: Re: [HP3000-L] OT: HAL-15 desktop supercomputer
> Greg asks:
>
> > How did HAL "screw up", in the sense meant by the author?
>
> Writing all of this from memory, HAL predicted a failure in the AE-35 unit
> mounted on the deep space telemetry antenna in four days. When the unit
was
> taken out of the antenna -- on HAL's recommendation -- and brought into
the
> main bay for analysis (using 1968 HP oscillosope probes, btw), one of the
two
> crewmen says, "I'll be damned if I can find anything wrong," and HAL
> responds, "It is puzzling."
>
> The far deeper problem that this failure by HAL to properly predict the
> failure implied was that no HAL 9000 computer had ever been known to make
a
> mistake -- and everyone, the crewmen, Houston control, and HAL himself
> realized the extremely serious implications of this mistake. While
problems
> with other, earth-bound HAL 9000's had been reported in the past, "This
kind
> of thing has cropped up in the past, but they've always been attributable
to
> human error," HAL said.
>
> The problem the crew now faced, given that HAL had clearly messed up, was
> that he ran every attribute of the ship's operation -- and their problem
was
> to engineer some method of disconnecting his higher brain functions while
> leaving the autonomic functions in place, without alarming HAL as to what
> they were planning on doing.
>
> It didn't work. HAL became alarmed.
>
> Wirt Atmar
>
> * To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
> * etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
|
