If anyone knows how to get in touch with Glenn Corbin directly, please
let him know his mailer is brain-damaged.
Jeff
E500_SMTP_Mail_Service wrote:
>
> ------ Failed Recipients ------
>
> <[log in to unmask]>: Transaction failed. [SMTP Error Code 554]
> -------- Returned Mail --------
>
> Received: from unknown(198.135.242.6) by webshielde500 via csmap
> id 3278; Mon, 10 Dec 2001 17:53:36 -0500 (EST)
> Received: from unknown(198.135.242.6) by webshielde500 via csmap
> id 3277; Mon, 10 Dec 2001 17:53:36 -0500 (EST)
> Received: from unknown(198.135.242.6) by webshielde500 via csmap
> id 3276; Mon, 10 Dec 2001 17:53:36 -0500 (EST)
> Received: from unknown(198.135.242.6) by webshielde500 via csmap
> id 3275; Mon, 10 Dec 2001 17:53:36 -0500 (EST)
> Received: from unknown(198.135.242.6) by webshielde500 via csmap
> id 3274; Mon, 10 Dec 2001 17:53:36 -0500 (EST)
> Received: from unknown(198.135.242.6) by webshielde500 via csmap
> id 3273; Mon, 10 Dec 2001 17:53:36 -0500 (EST)
> Received: from unknown(198.135.242.6) by webshielde500 via csmap
> id 3272; Mon, 10 Dec 2001 17:53:36 -0500 (EST)
> Received: from unknown(198.135.242.6) by webshielde500 via csmap
> id 3271; Mon, 10 Dec 2001 17:53:36 -0500 (EST)
> Received: from unknown(198.135.242.6) by webshielde500 via csmap
> id 3270; Mon, 10 Dec 2001 17:53:36 -0500 (EST)
> Received: from unknown(198.135.242.6) by webshielde500 via csmap
> id 3269; Mon, 10 Dec 2001 17:53:36 -0500 (EST)
> Received: from unknown(198.135.242.6) by webshielde500 via csmap
> id 3268; Mon, 10 Dec 2001 17:53:36 -0500 (EST)
> Received: from unknown(198.135.242.6) by webshielde500 via csmap
> id 3267; Mon, 10 Dec 2001 17:53:36 -0500 (EST)
> Received: from unknown(198.135.242.6) by webshielde500 via csmap
> id 3266; Mon, 10 Dec 2001 17:53:36 -0500 (EST)
> Received: from unknown(198.135.242.6) by webshielde500 via csmap
> id 3265; Mon, 10 Dec 2001 17:53:36 -0500 (EST)
> Received: from unknown(198.135.242.6) by webshielde500 via csmap
> id 3264; Mon, 10 Dec 2001 17:53:36 -0500 (EST)
> Received: from unknown(198.135.242.6) by webshielde500 via csmap
> id 3263; Mon, 10 Dec 2001 17:53:35 -0500 (EST)
> Received: from raven.utc.edu(199.76.196.24) by webshielde500 via csmap
> id 3262; Mon, 10 Dec 2001 17:53:35 -0500 (EST)
> Received: from raven (raven.utc.edu) by raven.utc.edu (LSMTP for Windows NT v1.1b) with SMTP id <[log in to unmask]>; Mon, 10 Dec 2001 17:53:51 -0500
> Received: from RAVEN.UTC.EDU by RAVEN.UTC.EDU (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8d)
> with spool id 59908 for [log in to unmask]; Mon, 10 Dec 2001
> 17:53:50 -0500
> Received: from isanntmail.cgiusa.com (isanntmail.isisys.com) by raven.utc.edu
> (LSMTP for Windows NT v1.1b) with SMTP id <[log in to unmask]>;
> Mon, 10 Dec 2001 17:53:50 -0500
> Received: by isanntmail.isisys.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id
> <Y4FZTQCX>; Mon, 10 Dec 2001 17:56:01 -0500
> Deferred-Delivery: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 17:53:00 -0500
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> Message-ID: <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 17:54:49 -0500
> Reply-To: [log in to unmask]
> Sender: HP-3000 Systems Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
> From: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Continuing Interex membership a win win?
> Comments: To: [log in to unmask]
> To: [log in to unmask]
>
> X-no-Archive:yes
> > Jeff (not understanding why sane people expect good stuff to be
> > free) Vance, CSY
>
> Because we do not distinguish between free and things which have a hidden
> cost?
>
> And isn't this an old debate: what should the OS include? Everything that
> comes with the OS cost someone something to develop, compile, or test, even
> if it's a port of OSS (Open Source Software). Windows included WordPad
> because OS/2 had a rudimentary word processor. Is WordPad really worth
> having? At what price? OTOH, should MPE include IMAGE? Or even KSAM? This
> cuts both ways.
>
> That said, you can't argue with success. OSs have included goodies that
> probably would not have gotten used and adopted half so readily if they were
> for cost add-ons. OTOH, I had always assumed that MPE did not offer a good
> full screen editor or robust database query tool, so as to leave room for
> the third-party vendors to prosper. It has been suggested that whenever MS
> bundles any utility, even scandisk, EMM386, or MSAV, those utility vendors
> get hurt, bad.
>
> And, whose hands do you put these tools into at deep discounts, or for free?
> Students? Developers? End users?
>
> It does not appear to be a simple issue, at all.
>
> Greg Stigers
> http://www.cgiusa.com
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
|
