Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 6 Dec 2001 08:31:53 -0600 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
In article <[log in to unmask]>,
Mark Wonsil <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> As for HP, how do they handle the commodity issue? The auto industry has
> gone through two such events. When Ford got into the mass production
> business he tried to make the car a commodity. Later the Japanese did the
> same. Did the existing auto-makers throw away their high-valued line?
The ones who didn't went out of business or were bought by Ford or GM, who
applied commodity methods to producing a "high end" commodity vehicle that
was good enough even if it was no Duesenberg.
There's a bunch of non-commodity cars, but they tend to be special purpose
machines: construction equipment, recreational vehicles, military, that sort
of thing. Stewart and Stevenson here in Houston make some amazingly cool
offroad trucks, but they're not Duesenberg either.
--
`-_-' In hoc signo hack, Peter da Silva.
'U` "A well-rounded geek should be able to geek about anything."
-- [log in to unmask]
Disclaimer: WWFD?
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
|
|
|