HP3000-L Archives

November 2001, Week 2

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Richard Gambrell <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Richard Gambrell <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 9 Nov 2001 21:38:29 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (115 lines)
I agree that the database is probably a large measure of the
difference we observed. I could have stated that more clearly.
It takes very good database administration coupled with very good
design and programming to use SQL and a RDBMS well.  The benefits
of a RDBMS are flexibility and easy of reporting, not transaction
update performance.

I posted our experience for those thinking that perhaps if they
have to learn Unix, they might as well use Oracle.  It's not
that easy, if you want to preserve decent performance.  It's a lot
of work and redesign, but it also take real knowledge and expertise
with Oracle and SQL.

Richard

Charles Finley wrote:
>
> In a study commissioned by one of our customers comparing TurboIMAGE on MPE
> and HP Eloquence (an IMAGE clone) on HP-UX, we were able to achieve almost
> identical database performance.   In each case we used the UNIX equivalent
> model of theHP 3000.  I believe that the database is a key determinant of
> performance on the respective operating systems.  RDBMS's seem to have a lot
> more overhead.  That's the price you pay for the perceived additional
> functionality.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Richard Gambrell" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 5:40 PM
> Subject: Re: Comparison studies of HP3000 and HP9000?
>
> > HPUX isn't that bad, but it doesn't perform like MPE at all.
> > Our comparasions of some batch type programs with similar
> > capabilities suggest at least a 1:6 performance drop going from
> > MPE/Image to HPUX/Oracle (i.e. processing on HPUX/Oracle is
> > 6 times slower than MPE/Image).  Please note that this is a
> > conservative figure use in rough planning, your experience may
> > vary.  Poor quality application software and how the database
> > is used will dominate over hardware performance.  Can you be
> > sure the quality of your HPUX application will be better than your
> > MPE application?
> >
> > Richard
> >
> > "John P. Bardessono" wrote:
> > >
> > > I agree. What are the external costs (data base systems, support
> utilities)
> > > and what is the comarable performance?
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Curt Brimacomb [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> > > > Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 3:40 PM
> > > > To: [log in to unmask]
> > > > Subject: Re: [HP3000-L] Comparison studies of HP3000 and HP9000?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > how can you pay a HP-UX person $50 and the DBA person $50 and
> > > > not get shot?
> > > > Or is that where the downtime come in? ;-)
> > > >
> > > > Curt Brimacomb
> > > > Systems Manager
> > > > Idaho Computer Services, LLC
> > > > [log in to unmask]
> > > > 208-734-2245 x 114 Twin Falls
> > > > 208-628-2754 Riggins
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > >
> > > > Here we go:
> > > >
> > > > HP3K                                  HP9K
> > > >
> > > > 100,000                                5,000                Hardware
> > > >   25,000                                  100                 Software
> > > >   10,000                                  100                 Support
> > > >    99.9% uptime                        99.9% downtime
> > > >
> > > > Need more, let me know!
> > > >
> > > > * To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
> > > > * etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
> > > >
> > >
> > > * To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
> > > * etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
> >
> > --
> > Richard L Gambrell, Senior Information Technology Consultant and
> > Director of Computing Systems and Networks
> > Information Technology Division, University of Tennessee at Chattanooga
> > Fax: 423-755-4150                Support Help-Desk: 423-755-4000
> > Direct phone: 423-755-5316       ITD Business Office: 423-757-1755
> > Mobile (urgent): 423-432-5122    Main UTC: 423-755-4111
> > Email: [log in to unmask]
> >
> > * To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
> > * etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
>
> * To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
> * etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

--
Richard L Gambrell, Senior Information Technology Consultant and
Director of Computing Systems and Networks
Information Technology Division, University of Tennessee at Chattanooga
Fax: 423-755-4150                Support Help-Desk: 423-755-4000
Direct phone: 423-755-5316       ITD Business Office: 423-757-1755
Mobile (urgent): 423-432-5122    Main UTC: 423-755-4111
Email: [log in to unmask]

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2