HP3000-L Archives

November 2001, Week 2

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Alan Greig <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Alan Greig <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 14 Nov 2001 04:46:01 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
On Mon, 12 Nov 2001 13:30:22 -0600 (Central Standard Time),
"Costantino, Rocky" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>Dear 3000 Listers,
>
>I am looking for information on system tiering with regards to CA MANMAN.
>The current system is a 947LX. Apparently an A-class (A400-100-110) is
>considered a higher tier as far as MANMAN software licensing is concerned
>(even though HP considers it in the same tier). Does anyone have knowledge

Now that's strange as CA don't bump MANMAN prices for VMS on faster
processors. You can go from an ancient VAX to the fastest Alpha
without incurring a price hike.

>of what "supported" systems are in the same MANMAN tier as a 947? Seems to
>me that only a 918 and 928 would possibly fall within this tier as far as
>Relative Performance is concerned.
>
>Thanks!
>
>Rocky J. Costantino
>
>* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
>* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

--
Alan

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2