HP3000-L Archives

November 2001, Week 1

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: COBOL
From:
Shawn Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Shawn Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 1 Nov 2001 11:00:51 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines) 
There is a very small difference, I did some performance tests years
ago, but I got in the habit of using the INDEXED BY because of some of
the convenient features of it, however some of the problems are that you
can't display the index so there are situations where it is bothersome.

On Thursday, November 1, 2001, at 10:55 AM, Shahan, Ray wrote:

> Hey all,
>
> Does anyone know if there is any performance diff gained by using
> INDEXED BY
> over using a separate field as an index while accessing very large
> arrays?
>
> * To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
> * etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
>

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2