HP3000-L Archives

October 2001, Week 4

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
XLand RL
From:
"Shahan, Ray" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Shahan, Ray
Date:
Mon, 22 Oct 2001 16:13:41 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines) 
Hi all,

I have a question on RL vs. XL.

Given an outer block A that calls subprog E as well as 3 sub-progs B, C, and
D, and subprogs B, C and D also call subprog  E, is there really any
measurable speed benefit to making E an RL vs. leaving it an XL?  It seems
that once the module, E,  from the XL is mapped into memory, it should be as
quick as the RL that was compiled into A, B,  C and D...even though the
manual states otherwise?

Anyone?

Thanks in advance.

Ray Shahan

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2