Pardon my imprecise vocabulary, but:
With most checksumming (bytewise) the bytes could be reordered yielding the same checksum. Granted we were not talking about checksumming only, but a sugestion to help detect malicious alterations -
checksumming on some n-bit cycle where n is best chosen as a prime number > 3 would make the changes of byte-swapped data producing the same checksum much smaller.
-Dave
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *