Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 3 Oct 2001 08:59:35 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
can't this be made as simple as would be hp3000 -> hp3000 -> hp3000? no
timing issues at all if under one linear control, as in...
sys1:hello tracy,mgr.acct1
sys1:DSLINE r=sys2
sys1:remote :R
#Rhello tracy,mgr.acct2
sys2:run suprtool
>save output;exit
sys2::
sys1:dscopy output:r to mycopy
sys1:process
sys1:bye
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lars Appel [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 3:19 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: hp9000 -> hp3000 -> hp9000
>
>
> >Now all you need is a trigger to let the 9000 know that the
> file is back on
> >the 9000 and ready to be processed. My favorite technique to
> accomplish this
> >is merely the presence of the newly transferred file itself.
>
> An alternative for having the 9000 "poll" a watch directory would be
> using REMSH.NET.SYS to "logon to the 9000" and trigger the processing.
>
> Lars.
>
> * To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
> * etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
>
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *
|
|
|