On Saturday, October 06, 2001 10:21 PM. Lee Bell wrote:

(snip of incromprehensible twaddle.)

> You have talked in circles, made unsupported allegations about a cruisade
> waged against you by, made statements you then denied and been caught in
> mistakes you have declined to admit.

I suggest that  - having first read your initial posts that prompted my
responses - you make an effort to clearly and concisely detail:
a)  What it is you mean?
b)  Your purpose in starting it in the first place?
And:
c)  What it is you are trying to achieve?
(Is it that my presence on this list offends you?
Is it because of my refusal to lend my support to you in your ongoing
vendetta against Bob?
Is it because I largely ignore your private posts?
Or is it for some other reason(s) that - being a simple soul - continues to
elude me?)

Should this prove too difficult for you then, please, invite somebody who
agrees with what you have said - and your conclusions - to do the task for
you.  (It's OK, I don't 'shoot messengers'.  It's just that - should I have
wronged or misinterpreted you in any way - then I would like to understand
how?)

Strike