Tony,
Is it possible that the file equation is now pointing to Ldev 1 and ignoring
the BADDEV altogether? I am not near a 3000 right now. What happens if
you do the same thing with :FILE T;DEV=9BADDEV? (And I am assuming you do
not have an ldev 9 there.)
Even still, the BADDEV should have been tagged as a syntax error. Just
wondering.
Mark Wonsil
-----Original Message-----
Friends - please note the follow CI below - in particular the failure of MPE
to report the invalid device class when the first character of the device
name contains a numeric character.
You have been warned !!.
S:file t;dev=LP
S:FILE T;DEV=GARBAGE
^
Unknown device class. (CIERR 344)
S:FILE T;DEV=1BADDEV
S:showdev 1baddev
^
Logical device class "1BADDEV" cannot be found on the system. (CIERR 1583)
S:
* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *