HP3000-L Archives

July 2001, Week 1

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"HOFMEISTER,JAMES (HP-USA,ex1)" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
HOFMEISTER,JAMES (HP-USA,ex1)
Date:
Mon, 2 Jul 2001 11:21:46 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (48 lines)
Hello Folks @ 3000-l,

Re: faulty processor

Not a hardware guy, but just another perspective...

Processor was running fine for years...  and then took a system abort...
suspect possible power fluctuation... system restart fails and problem
diagnosed as bad CPU... CE comes on-site, replaces CPU and system will
not restart.  re-installed original CPU, booted and system runs... We
agreed to an action plan to monitor while another CPU was send to the
site as a precaution...  The S/48 ran fine for years until it was
decommissioned/replaced with out another CPU related failure.

Question? Is the "NEW" board in the CE kit going to be more reliable
than the burned in board existing in your machine now ?  The HP H/W
CE's have a pretty good feel for this and in a past life as a customer
of HP's, I was quite successful in relying on their expertise.

A few points here:

It is important to keep in mind when you introduce a new board into a
system that you have implemented change.  If a failure is going to be
seen it is most likely to be seen following some type of change and in
general as time goes by the failure rate will decrease significantly.

Question? Do you have the expertise in H/W to override a H/W CE
engineer's recommendation ?  Or would it be better to establish a
collaborative relationship where an action plan is developed to
maximize uptime, minimize change and reduce time to recover if
necessary.  Another question ? Do you have an established recovery
plan which meets the criteria of supporting your critical business
needs ?

The feed back in general from the folks on the 3000-L and from
customer surveys is the HP e3000 hardware is the most reliable in the
industry and that is one thing we all can appreciate!

Regards,

James Hofmeister
Hewlett Packard
Worldwide Technology Network Expert Center
P.S. My Ideals are my own, not necessarily my employers.

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2