Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 6 Jul 2001 21:48:37 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Lee Bell wrote:
> I'm all kinds of curious. I prefer moderately bright lights that cover
> larger areas. So far, my preferred light is a UK 400.
Lee --
I've been using a ShockWave by Princeton Tec for a couple of years. It uses
eight 'C' cells, and is therefore a lot smaller and lighter than the big 'D'
cell lights. It puts out a wonderfully smooth, even, fairly wide beam --
bright in the center and tapering off as it goes out. It is bright enough for
any diving I do -- including wrecks-- but broad enough that you can see lots of
stuff. A big improvement over my backup Tec 400, which is bright enough but
only illuminates a small, hot center-spot. A set of batteries in the ShockWave
will supposedly last eight hours. I can use one set for a week-long dive trip,
which will typically include three or four night dives. The only drawback is
lack of a second, hot-swappable lamp in case of failure at depth (although I
have never had a lamp failure). Otherwise I love it! Cost around US$60 via
mail-order.
[std. disclaimer: I have no financial or other interest in any manufacturer or
distributor of any dive equipment. Just a satisfied customer.]
Dive safe [\],
-Dave
--
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Dave DeBarger
[log in to unmask]
"ASSETS make things possible. PEOPLE make things happen!"
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
|
|
|