Bob writes:
> This is not the case. I've created a user without LG that can successfully
> open and modify data in a database with Logging enabled.
>
> I'm sure I've done this in the past. What's going on.?

I seem to recall it being argued whether the requirement for LG was a good
thing or a bad thing, with a number of people being unhappy about the need
to give every Image user LG capability since the users aren't using the
logging facility directly but Image is using it on their behalf and so it
really should be Image that "has LG" logically speaking.

Thus it's possible that Image got "enhanced" recently to remove the LG
requirement from the users.

I suspect that it didn't occur to anyone that it might be possible to make
use of this requirement as a security feature, or that someone might
actually be doing this.

G.

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *