Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 28 Jun 2001 21:52:50 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Krazy Kiwi wrote:
> Eh, I did not say the incident was caused by your boat, did not post that
> or imply that. Ive got a pretty good memory & can recall the whole
to-close-
> for-comfort incident as you posted a couple of times about it on this list
> so anyone interested can look up the archives. In fact I also sent a
> private message via you for Jayna when she ended up in hospital for
> observation. The majority of us who know Jayna personally were most
> concerned believe me.
Didn't intend to suggest you had. The key was the difference in the design
on mine which makes a similar incident highly unlikely.
> Hmmm Im assuming the stolen boat you were talking about with Chuck in
another posting (was up for sale), would have been insured so they wont be
> out of pocket if they had paid decent insurance premiums. Sadly stealing
> high performance cars and boats to order is all the rage with our thieves
> here in Perth :-(
It was for sale and insured. Presumably, the insurance company will
eventually pay off. On the other hand, when a boat that has been for sale
for a while turns up missing, it tends to raise the suspicions of insurance
investigators. I'm sure that's happening in this case.
Lee
|
|
|