Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 31 May 2001 10:20:43 +0100 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
>On Tue, 29 May 2001 10:55:23 +0100, Andy Johnson <[log in to unmask]>
>wrote, in reply to Christian Gerzner:
>Regarding the THICKNESS of the wetsuit at 33 fsw:
>CG >indeed your wetsuit is (amost) half its surface
>CG >thickness at that depth
>>Correct, except for the fact that it is totally wrong.
>And INCORRECT! :-)
>RF > Nevermind the rest of your assertions that are equally baseless.
>Andy, glad to see someone (you) elaborate on the rest, about how
>Christian was TOTALLY wrong in all his assertions, and had the gall
>to pick on Dave DeBarger and flame me for correcting only one of
>his major errors.
>CG> So, you have adjudged that _everything_ I said in that post is
>CG> baseless. I suspect that there might be a few around here who just
>CG> possibly could disagree with you there.
>Correct! :-) There MIGHT be a few "who just possibly could disagree
>with you here". Did I miss somebody?
>Was Andy the one? <:-)
>Christian's PC must have broken down, again. I wonder why he hadn't
>replied to Andy. ;-)
>-- Bob.
It doesn't matter how many agree or disagree, what's wrong is wrong !!! :-)
But here's an interesting thought, take a piece of neoprene down to say
10m, how much would you expect it to shrink in LENGTH ?
Andy Johnson
Senior Product Support Specialist
UK HSC DASD
Basingstoke AL1C
Tel: 01256 34 1474 (Hunting Group)
Tel: 01256 34 1264 (Direct)
Mobile:07703 59 8282 Mobex:277 321
e-mail [log in to unmask]
|
|
|