HP3000-L Archives

April 2001, Week 4

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Leonard S. Berkowitz" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
[log in to unmask][log in to unmask], 23 Apr 2001 16:01:22 -0500558_- Tom Emerson wrote:
>
> I received an e-mail from a friend suggesting this, and I have to agree it
> does have merit, but at the same time it might be a ploy by one of the
> other companies to grab market share -- you be the judge...
>
> Basically, my friend pointed out that Mobil & Exxon, which in reality are
> one and the same, holds the largest market share. The "idea" is simply to
> not buy gasoline from these companies. (it would be great if we didn't
> have to buy gasoline in [...]38_23Apr200116:01:[log in to unmask]
Date:
Thu, 26 Apr 2001 15:36:27 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
In a testing account, a program failed to load with four UNRESOLVED EXTERNALS.
This program does load and run with no problem in production.

I seen that the test XL was created in January, probably some update from the
vendor, as we are testing a new application module.

I can find references (LINKEDIT: LISTXL) to these externals in both the
production XL and the test XL In fact these externals seem to be present in
many, many modules in both XL files.

Why does this program load in production, but not in test?

Thanks.
===================
Leonard S. Berkowitz
Perot Health Care Systems
(Harvard Pilgrim Health Care account)
voice: 617-509-1212
fax:   617-509-3737
pager: 781-226-2431

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2