SCUBA-SE Archives

April 2001

SCUBA-SE@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Steven Catron <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
SouthEast US Scuba Diving Travel list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 8 Apr 2001 22:50:19 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Reef Fish" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 16:22
Subject: [SCUBA-SE] Another Loose End tied!


> > Lee was the one who introduced the term "recruited" which was NOT
> > in my statement he cited.  However, I saw no objection to his use
> > of the term since it coincided with my understanding of the term
> > "was recruited".

> The only USA posters on the list who backed the FOREIGN use of
> "recruited" to mean "successfully recruited" were three who have
> been KNOWN to find any excuse to flame "Bob".  :-)
????

As one of the posters to whom 'recruited' implies success, I suppose you're
including me in that group.  But, for the life of me, I can't recall one
single post - flame or otherwise - I've made to or about you on either -L
or -SE in at least the last two years.

So much for being "KNOWN to find any excuse to flame 'Bob'."

Or was my inclusion an oversight on your part?

Steven

ATOM RSS1 RSS2