Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 21 Mar 2001 21:32:54 +1100 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Reef Fish <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
(snips)
> That prompted me to give Wayne a phone call to ask about certain
> Aggressor matters and in the course of our conversation asked him
> some questions about the EPIRB that will be used on the Aggressor.
> >From the info dispensed in THIS FORUM, it is pretty clear that NO
> ONE had spoken to anyone in the Aggressor Fleet (if at all) who
> has the CORRECT information about their units, because I got the
> info from Wayne Hasson himself, who ordered the units and cited
> facts and figures on top of his head without having to refer to
> anything. I consider him the authoratative source about the
> units used on the AGGRESSOR FLEET. :-)
> I got the info from Wayne Hasson himself
Where are the <facts and figures> Wayne Hasson (whoever he is [I know,
I know]) mentions? Are they, if presented, verifyable?
To my mind you are providing hearsay, something you often claim to be
very much against.
> This is NOT to re-open the can of dirty worms, but simply to TIE
> UP some loose ends while giving this list some CURRENT INFO about
> the unit itself and where it will be used that are until now
> UNKNOWN to anyone of the list, not even in the News Release (else
> I think someone might have reported it).
You have nevertheless allowed that particular can of worms to arouse
out of their torpor, thus bringing up a can of worms very much best
left dead and buried.
Perhaps that was not a good idea.
> CURRENT INFO about the unit itself and where it will be
> used that are until now UNKNOWN to anyone of the list
What "CURRENT INFO"? I don't see any current info. Care to provide it?
> are until now UNKNOWN to anyone of the list
Where has this "until now UNKNOWN" since been provided to the list?
> not even in the News Release
What News Release? Or are we here talking about that very first one
which, let's simply say, was rather suspect?
Christian
|
|
|