On Sat, 17 Mar 2001 10:54:25 -0500, Lee Bell wrote:

> > Thanks for that J-M - you bastard!  :-)
> > I've tried deviousness and trickery but I still can't make the figures
in
> > that model match my own and in that regard I have no hesitancy in
> admitting
> > my error!  :-)

> You're being too hard on yourself.  Several of your numbers are, in fact,
> contained within the data JM provided.

Duhh!

(snip)

> It's quite interesting that my assumed 2 liters at the end of the exhale
> cycle was, in fact, very close to the volume included in JM's information.
> As I mentioned in the original thread, I had just finished a similar
> discussion elsewhere.  I suspect it was not chance that I came close, but
am
> certain it was not my "vast knowledge" that let me come so close.

Me neither!

>If I am correct, then the risk at full
> exhale is even lower.

I can't think of anyone whom I'd rather see put the courage of their
convictions to the test!

Strike