Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | Johnson, Tracy |
Date: | Fri, 23 Feb 2001 10:02:11 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Isn't this the same technique Osama bin Laden people
are using to encode terrorist instructions within
internet porn images?
(Heard at FBI, "Honest Director, I was
looking for terrorists,... really."
Tracy Johnson
-----Original Message-----
From: COLE,GLENN (Non-HP-SantaClara,ex2) [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2001 6:49 PM
>That watermark (which is normally done by writing some sort of signature
into
>the low order bits of an image, across many pixels, so that it can't really
>be seen in the image) lasts exactly as long as the image is not manipulated
>in any manner (made larger, smaller, cropped or converted into another
>graphic format). At that point, the watermark is gone.
Makes sense. How about a *visible* watermark then? (Of course,
I don't know if this is acceptable in Dave's case.)
http://www.imagingweb.com/aff/visual_watermark.htm
or
http://www.graphicssoft.about.com/compute/graphicssoft/c/ht/00/07/How_Add_Te
xt_Watermark0963973007.htm
(with apologies for the wrap).
--Glenn
|
|
|