HP3000-L Archives

February 2001, Week 4

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Leonard S. Berkowitz" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Fri, 23 Feb 2001 07:13:42 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
Jon Cohen asks:

<<   o  Which Powerpatch (first, second, third, ...?) is the appropriate
       one to "Push"?  What criteria should HP use to determine which
       Powerpatch is the "Push"?>>

Isn't the answer rather obvious? The one that works!

I work at an installation that installed 6.5 on various machines without too
much fuss, until we got to the high-level machines. It then took HP 2-3 months
to get this release patched so that it would work properly on our two high-end
997-1200 with 16 Gb of memory. I do not think that we should have been a/the
beta testing site (or maybe we were an/the alpha <grin> site) for this release
that was advertised to be directed at the high-end machines in the first place.
===================
Leonard S. Berkowitz
Perot Health Care Systems
(Harvard Pilgrim Health Care account)
voice: 617-509-1212
fax:   617-509-3737
pager: 781-226-2431

ATOM RSS1 RSS2