HP3000-L Archives

February 2001, Week 4

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Stan Sieler <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Stan Sieler <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 27 Feb 2001 17:47:34 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
Hi,

The current wording on SIGMPE item #24 needs clarification.

It's now:

   24. Currently, programs that require PM must reside in an MPE group.
       The proposal is to remove this restriction.

It should be:

   24. Currently, programs that require PM must reside in an MPE group.
       This can be a problem for some programs that want to reside
       outside a group (i.e., with an HFS name).

       The proposal is to provide a secure method of removing or reducing
       this restriction.  One possibility would be to have a system manager
       created list of HFS program files that are allowed to get PM capability.

Remember, vote at:

 http://oblina.csillc.com/sigs      or
 http://207.103.9.100/sigs

--
Stan Sieler                                           [log in to unmask]
www.allegro.com/sieler/wanted/index.html                  www.sieler.com

ATOM RSS1 RSS2