HP3000-L Archives

February 2001, Week 3

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Dave Darnell <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Dave Darnell <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 16 Feb 2001 12:06:54 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (70 lines)
in line responses.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jim Phillips [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Friday, February 16, 2001 6:51 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: OT: Did We Go To The Moon
> 1)  Why are there no stars in the black lunar "sky" in any of the
> photographs or movies?
Probably the dynamic range of the recording equipment or media.  Direct
sunlight on light lunar material, white space suits, so affective apeture or
F-stop is so low that the stars would not show up.

>
> 2)  Why was there no blast crater from the rocket engine on
> the LEM when it
> landed?
Dunno.  I question the assumptions.

>
> 3)  If the moon is supposedly covered in dust, why was there
> no dust on the
> LEM after it landed?
Perhaps in a vaccumm, the dust will not billow up and then settle slowly.
Probably all the dust from the landing was blown away from the site.  It's
lateral speed will not be slowed down in a vacuum as it would be in an
atmosphere.  None of the dust would have been blown straight up, so none
would fall back onto the lander.

>
> 4)  How did they take that neat picture of the astronaut with
> the sun behind
> him
> and still able to see the detail of his suit and images in
> his visor?  The
> astronaut should have been in silhouette.
In a vacuum there is no diffusion.  The sun would show up at the maximum of
the recording medium's dynamic range, which would be white on film.  There
would be blooming on a TV camera.  There would be no silhouetting.

>
> 5)  Why are the shadows going different directions in the
> pictures if there
> was
> only one light source (the Sun)?
>
The appearance of divergent shadows is caused by the use of a wide-angle
lens.

> 6)  With the Sun behind the LEM, how did they get a picture
> of the shadowed
> side with full detail of the lander?
The shadowed side still received reflected light from the surface.

>
> 7)  Some of the pictures and films that are supposed to be at
> different
> locations have the exact same land features/details.
Dunno.

>
> Inquiring minds want to know!
>
> Jim Phillips                           Information Systems Manager
> Email: [log in to unmask]     Therm-O-Link, Inc.
> Phone: 330-527-2124                         P. O. Box 285
> Fax:   330-527-2123                           10513 Freedom Street
> Web:   http://www.tolwire.com          Garrettsville, OH  44231
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2