HP3000-L Archives

February 2001, Week 3

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Performance HP989-100 versus N4000-100-220
From:
Marco Suerig <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Marco Suerig <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 16 Feb 2001 03:25:06 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (10 lines) 
With a look to the Instruction/Data Cache sizes of the CPUs you can get an
idea why the performance units are like that:
The 989KS/100 has an Instruction Cache size of 2048KB and a Data Cache Size
of 2048KB.
The N4000-100-220 has an I-Cache size of 512KB and a D-Cache size of 1024KB.

I do not know how the HP e3000 performance Units are measured but the
N-Class should be faster regarding I/O activities because of higher PCI BUS
Speed in comparision to HP-PB Bus speed.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2