Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 5 Jan 2001 07:52:16 -0800 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi Tom :)
Ok... so a bit of a <PLUG> for the Interex CSL... are the free utils in
there? if so what are the names so I can give 'em a try too :)
Art "Free is a very good Price! (tm Tom Peterson) Portland Icon hehe" Bahrs
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Renz" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, January 05, 2001 7:06 AM
Subject: Re: [HP3000-L] Transact database program getting slower
> Chris,
>
> We have a no cost (f r e e) utility that will map any master data set
> showing a graph of the Primaries and Secodaries and the percentages of
> each within each percent of the set's capacity. We will be happy to
> send you a copy to see what your distribution and where your peaks are
> within the data set(s) in question. Let us know.
>
> Also we have a couple of other no cost utilities that set vars with the
current version of TurboIMAGE and if desired each db intrinsic.
> Basically the same list as listed in QUERY but setting variables. And
> the second no cost utility lists all data sets within a data set
> and almost all the info you would like to see for each data set
> (name, set number, MPE file name, Extent names if jumbo, the number of
> sectors used, the record length, media length, the data sets tied via
> Image Keys, average chain lengths, and more). Let us know if you are
> also interested in any of these other no cost (f r e e) utilities.
>
> <Plug>
>
> Now for the plug. We also have a tool that can measure each db call
> made and provide statistics on the calls to provide you information
> such as longest call in CPU & wall time. This could answer how long
> it takes for each DBPUT to complete as well as any other db call.
> Let us know if you would be interested in a demo.
>
> </Plug>
>
> Tom Renz
>
> ---------------------
> On Wed, 3 Jan 2001 at 05:46:49 you wrote:
> >Hello everyone
> >
> >Thanks for the replies.
> >
> >My master set is 3 million records in a capacity of 6 million. The
> >set is therefore only 50 percent full.
> >
> >The key item (SYGEKSNR) X10 is a 10 digit number built as follows
> >DDMMYYNNNN. The whole thing satisfies some modulo 11 arithmetic. It
> >could be possible that I am getting secondaries. How can I check ?
> >Are there tools available for checking ?
> >
> >I am splitting my program into updating and adding and will perform
> >some timing tests. I really don't know where the bottleneck is.
> >
> >The updates to the database are received every 15 minutes. How safe
> >would output deferred mode be in this case ?
> >
> >I am using entry level locking to update existing records.
> >
> >We have 37 machines with varying memory configurations and Operating
> >system versions, but the majority are 6.0 or higher.
> >
> >Thanks again for the help
> >
> >Chris
|
|
|