On 13 Dec 2000, at 12:56, Jim Phillips wrote:

> Now, can someone explain what "13 times more reliable than
> Windows 98" really means?  If Windows 98 crashed 100 times, then
> I can expect Windows 2000 to crash 1/13th of that (or 7.7 times)?

13 x 0 = 0

I'm surprised that they didn't choose a larger multiple.


---   *** e-mail is not a secure channel ***
James B. Byrne                Harte & Lyne Limited
vox: +1 905 561 1241          9 Brockley Drive
fax: +1 905 561 0757          Hamilton, Ontario
mailto:[log in to unmask]  Canada L8E 3C3