Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 30 Nov 2000 17:59:28 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
"Pickering, John (NORBORD)" wrote:
>
> >We also saw the value to the HP 9000 product line in maintaining
> >a clean naming convention (i.e., L1000, L2000, L3000).
>
> Unlike the 3000 naming conventions, such as ...
>
> RELEASE: C.55.03 MPE/iX HP31900 C.05.08
Well, a fairer comparasion would be with the output of uname -a, such
as: HP-UX falcon B.11.00 B 9000/899 1668472361 16-user license
Note that this "899" is really sold as a HP 9000 K570/400 and that
there is no indication at all of the patch level (unlike MPE). This
particular machine has around a 1,000 patches installed including a
Line-in-the-Sand patch that is really an O.S. revision, but HP didn't
want to deal the with yet another HP-UX release version change.
Richard
>
> :-)
--
Richard L Gambrell
Senior Information Technology Consultant
Head - Systems and Networks/Information Technology Division
University of Tennessee at Chattanooga
103 Hunter Hall, Department Code 4454
615 McCallie Ave., Chattanooga, TN 37403-2598
voice mail/cell phone: 423-432-5122
private e-mail: [log in to unmask]
UTC fax: 423-755-4150
UTC phone: 423-755-4551
UTC email: [log in to unmask]
|
|
|