HP3000-L Archives

November 2000, Week 4

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Steve Belkacem <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Steve Belkacem <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 27 Nov 2000 18:07:11 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (50 lines)
Sorry I meant Routing.

Apologies
--- Jeff Kell <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Steve
Belkacem wrote:
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > In the dim and distant past, I remember that there
> was
> > a way to bridge over DTC traffic over a WAN with a
> > serail connection. I believe that it involved a
> couple
> > of DTC's and did not involve Openview.
>
> If you "really bridge" it and own all the
> infrastructure between your
> central site and the remote DTCs, yes.  You can
> simply bridge
> unilaterally (not terribly efficient), bridge 802.3
> encapsulated packets
> (better), or set a protocol type filter to only
> bridge AFCP and ADCP
> protocol types.  You'll have to pull out your magic
> decoder ring for
> those values, I don't think they are listed by the
> IANA references.
>
> If you don't own the whole infrastructure, you *may*
> be able to tunnel
> it over IP, with the above caveats on what packets
> you bridge through
> the tunnel (I'm speaking cisco routers here, your
> mileage may vary with
> another vendor).
>
> So yes, it is possible in certain situations, but
> not terribly efficient
> if you have mixed protocols on your network
> (especially
> 802.3-encapsulated Novell IPX).
>
> Jeff Kell <[log in to unmask]>


____________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.co.uk address at http://mail.yahoo.co.uk
or your free @yahoo.ie address at http://mail.yahoo.ie

ATOM RSS1 RSS2