Hi Mikael,

Thanks for the quick reply.
Are the new Java programs run on 3000? Or, are they front-end applications running on
PCs? I think there are solutions available in both cases, and may not warrant a
migration to Oracle.

Just my thoughts. You are sure to get several responses to this in the list.

Regards,
Vikram

Mikael A Olesen wrote:

> Hi
>
> The reason why we are going from IMAGE to Oracle is only because we are
> reprogramming our programs into JAVA and for a period of time we have to
> run two systems side by side using the same databases (Oracle) until we are
> done.
>
> Regards
> Mikael A. Olesen
> Programmør
> Den Kristelige Fagbevægelse
> (tlf) Kontor  +45 8911 2390
> (tlf) Hjemmearbejdsplads 8745 0890
>
>
>                     B T Vikram
>                     Kumar                To:     Mikael A Olesen <[log in to unmask]>
>                     <vikram@india        cc:     [log in to unmask]
>                     .hp.com>             Subject:     Re: [HP3000-L]
>
>                     13-10-00
>                     12.43
>
>
>
> Attention is drawn to discussion in this list two weeks ago, about Oracle
> on
> 3000. Oracle has decided not to support its database on 3000, starting from
> end of this year. In this context, do you really want to migrate from IMAGE
> to
> Oracle. May we know of technical reasons (there may be business reasons),
> if
> any for this. If the reason is just to move to a RDBMS, please have a
> relook
> at relational acces to IMAGE through IMAGE/SQl.
>
> Regards,
> Vikram
>
> Mikael A Olesen wrote:
>
> >  Hi
> >
> >  Are there anyone out there that runs HP on HP3000 on a Oracle database?
> >  We have just moved some of our Image bases to Oracle and have run into
> >  major performance problems. A quick screen takes 2-3% cpu and each
> search
> >  can take from between 15 sec to 15 minutes! - The normal time is 1-2
> sec!
> >
> >  Does anyone out there have any experience on this?
> >
> >  Regards
> >
> >  Mikael Olesen
> >  dkf-Denmark