Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | Emerson, Tom # El Monte |
Date: | Thu, 14 Sep 2000 14:24:00 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Erik Vistica [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>
> "Emerson, Tom # El Monte" wrote:
> <snip>
> > If you hit your spell check button, and
> > wade past the names and e-mail addresses [and, for that matter,
> > "profileration" quoted in the first message] most likely
> you're spell
> > checker will insist that this should read "processor's"
> [funny aside, I > did this *right now* ...
> <snip>
>
> OK, *somebody* has to say it. Did you hit the spell check
> button before
> or after you typed "profileration" (this word is not in my hardcopy
> dictionary but "proliferation" is) ;-)
>
Actually... the first thing I did was spell-check the incoming message, and
noticed that it was incorrect in at least one instance in the original.
When I typed in the aside, I had actually spelled it correctly, and noticed
when I did a "final" check that it was NOT flagged [and I didn't hit "ignore
all"], so I carefully checked the original and saw it had two instances of
the word, and one with the transposed letters, so I un-corrected it so my
example matched reality...
|
|
|