HP3000-L Archives

September 2000, Week 2

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Melvin R Rees <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Melvin R Rees <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 13 Sep 2000 18:15:57 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines)
I agree with the memory comment.  FYI the 929KX/030 has a 81Mhz
PA-8000 (Perf. 3.7) and the original 939KS had a 80Mhz PA-7200 (Perf.
3.6), not much difference.  I don't mind used equipment as long as it
is "Legal" used equipment.  It works the same.  To upgrade the 939 to
a 979 is just $49,000,  sounds like a deal to me.  Get the 939 and
upgrade it.  More computer, less money.

Rgds
Mel

On Wed, 13 Sep 2000 17:15:49 -0500 (Central Daylight Time), "Douglas
C. Boyd" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>Greetings Knowledgeable Listers,
>
>We currently have an HP918RX with 32 users,  5 jobs, 6 printers, SNA/NRJE and
>RJE concurrently running, and are not happy with the response of the system.
>I'm told by various (including HP) that I need to move to a faster machine.
>
>I'm having a hard time deciding on rather to buy a new HP929KS/030 or a used
>HP939KS/010 and save $100k.  Other than the obvious problems with buying used
>equipment, and realizing that the HP939KS/010 has the older CPU, I just
>wondered if anyone had any comments on this matter.  Anyone currently using
>the HP939KS/010?
>
>TIA
>
>Douglas
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2