Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 13 Sep 2000 18:15:57 -0600 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I agree with the memory comment. FYI the 929KX/030 has a 81Mhz
PA-8000 (Perf. 3.7) and the original 939KS had a 80Mhz PA-7200 (Perf.
3.6), not much difference. I don't mind used equipment as long as it
is "Legal" used equipment. It works the same. To upgrade the 939 to
a 979 is just $49,000, sounds like a deal to me. Get the 939 and
upgrade it. More computer, less money.
Rgds
Mel
On Wed, 13 Sep 2000 17:15:49 -0500 (Central Daylight Time), "Douglas
C. Boyd" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>Greetings Knowledgeable Listers,
>
>We currently have an HP918RX with 32 users, 5 jobs, 6 printers, SNA/NRJE and
>RJE concurrently running, and are not happy with the response of the system.
>I'm told by various (including HP) that I need to move to a faster machine.
>
>I'm having a hard time deciding on rather to buy a new HP929KS/030 or a used
>HP939KS/010 and save $100k. Other than the obvious problems with buying used
>equipment, and realizing that the HP939KS/010 has the older CPU, I just
>wondered if anyone had any comments on this matter. Anyone currently using
>the HP939KS/010?
>
>TIA
>
>Douglas
>
|
|
|