Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sun, 6 Aug 2000 22:52:35 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Fri, 4 Aug 2000 22:18:50 +1000, David Strike wrote:
>On Friday, August 04, 2000 9:20 PM, Christian Gerzner wrote:
>> Well, I can't since I have the Digest. I have to laboriously scroll
>> down and, quite frankly, I'm getting sick and tired of it.
>
>> Solutions anyone?
>
>Yep! Don't subscribe to any diving-related NG, list or forum! :-)
>
>Strike
A less drastic, simple, and PERFECT solution for complainers like
Christian, for the reasons of his complaints, is:
http://raven.utc.edu/Archives/scuba-se.html
and READ ONLY those THREADS of AUTHORS of interest to the complainer.
It has the added advantage of NOT LOSING TRACK of the order and
sequence the postings in a THREAD took place, and who said what to
whom and when! (Which is the SOURCE of the majority of the flamewars
Christian complained about -- because ONE of the two parties didn't
read or misread what the other posted and was too lazy or didn't
know how to retrieve it from the WEB archives).
I have posted this FACT and SUGGESTION numerous times.
I have not read a SINGLE POST on-line or in the DIGEST for MONTHS
now. Not only that, but I have posted ALL replies directly from
the same webpage:
http://raven.utc.edu/Archives/scuba-se.html
BOOKMARK IT for future reference.
I have left some entire threads UNREAD.
The web-page archives are FAR BETTER than the Digest version because
it is VIRTUALLY real-time. (With only a slight delay than on-line),
and not delayed an entire day as the Digest does.
Now Christian (and others who complained publicly or silently), why
DIDN'T YOU know that?
-- Bob.
|
|
|