HP3000-L Archives

July 2000, Week 2

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Emerson, Tom # El Monte" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Emerson, Tom # El Monte
Date:
Fri, 14 Jul 2000 19:09:05 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dennis Heidner [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>
> DTC's are 10Mbs devices, if they are connected to a network
> switch such
> as a CISCO, the switch will handle the conversion to the 100Mbs rate
> offered by the 100BT card.  You must be on at least MPEiX 5.5
> with power
> patch 6 or later.
[...]
> However, in my opinion it makes more sense to let the DTC's use the
> slower 10Mbs interface that is built on the MIO card, and use
> the 100BT
> interface for inbound telnet, ds, ftp, web, etc.
[the rest snipped]

I realize this isn't the exact scenario previously described, but wouldn't
going to a 10/100 switch [converter] allow for more "overlap" when dealing
with multiple DTC's?  "in theory", since 100mb is 10 times faster than 10mb,
you should be able to "service" 10 DTC's consolidated through a 10/100
"switch" and a 100mb interface on the HP in the "same amount of time" as a
single DTC being serviced by a 10mb interface, or am I smoking something
that can't be bought at the corner drugstore?

ATOM RSS1 RSS2