Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 10 Jul 2000 09:02:54 +0200 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
greetings,
we've been using this on our wan for 3 years+, and, although stable,
easy to setup, easy to maintain, I would have to agree with Gavin and
Wirt in that it would probably not be my first choice (it do add to
complexity, I'm always scared the pc's will die the way pc's tend to do,
and, the remote dtc also seems more vulnerable when we have power and
network problems).
This has been discussed so you might try to search the archives, and, of
course, I'll gladly contribute with whatever knowledge I have.
/per
--------------------------------------------
Per Ostberg / [log in to unmask]
phone +46-8-58581213 / fax +46-8-58587710
Huddinge University Hospital
ChemLab / C1 74 / S-141 86 HUDDINGE / SWEDEN
--------------------------------------------
> We have the current version of Openview at both ends. I'm aware of
the configur
> ation settings for the CISCO routers, but it is a political issue AND
Cisco conf
> igurations have been discussed recently. That is why I'm asking only
for infor
> mation on Openview and Routable AFCP. Changing hardware (DTC's,
terminal serve
> rs, etc) is not an option.
> Dennis Heidner
.....
|
|
|