SCUBA-SE Archives

June 2000

SCUBA-SE@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Ralf Huebenthal <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
SouthEast US Scuba Diving Travel list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 28 Jun 2000 07:11:27 +1000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (60 lines)
Sorry Guy's but the only thing I can response to it: Thats you personal
problem and I give a d.... if it confuse you or not. I almost would say get
a life but you may thing this is root :-)

Ralf


----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Levy" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2000 2:20 AM
Subject: Re: [SCUBA-SE] Sorry


> On Tue, 27 Jun 2000 07:23:48 -0700
> Brian Gelfand <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> > Sherry,
> >
> > I second Ralf's opinion.
> >
> > You have nothing to apologize for, and nothing to feel
> > badly about.
> >
> > The delete key is a marvelous tool.  I use it all the
> > time!!
>
> That is not the point... if one wants to read the thread and it's
> responses are spread among both lists [because some responders inhabit
> only one list] then it makes it very difficult to follow without
> extreme cases of deja-vu and confusion because of the jumbled state
> between both lists.
> That is purely my point..... I happen to like reading everything so
> also like to enjoy it in the most efficient manner.
>
> Sherry's action of posting to both lists simultaneously is the problem,
> that is all I am complaining about .
>
> If she wishes to poll both lists then as Feesh said she should do it
> one at a time... that way one thread will work it's way out and the
> double list members will not be split about where to comment.
> I'm sure Sherry does not need to hear from the same person on both
> lists. I was not suggesting she should leave one list or the other...
> just not ask the identical question at the same time.
> The best way for her to do it would be to start in one, at the
> conclusion post in second a new post upgraded by what she collected on
> the first if she feels there are members who only reside in the one.
>
> With the volume of mail I read daily I need it to be efficient.... yes
> I am well aware that I have full control of that and can select to kill
> her threads in one group to solve it. That I consider a last resort.
> All I was attempting to do is highlight that there is a better and Net
> preferred way for her to post.
>
>
> Michael
> --
> Divers know the true meaning of peace of mind.
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2