SCUBA-SE Archives

June 2000

SCUBA-SE@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Bjorn Vang Jensen <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
SouthEast US Scuba Diving Travel list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 10 Jun 2000 04:39:18 +0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
I wrote:

> Side A says we are already as safe on air as we are going to be, and
> that even if we could cut the risk associated with air in half, that risk
would still
> be infinitesimally small.

Before someone (like Bob :-) discovers the obvious mistake, let me correct
myself: I meant to say "the GAIN IN SAFETY would still be infinitesimally
small".

Bjorn
http://www.bjornjensen.com

ATOM RSS1 RSS2