I wrote:
> Side A says we are already as safe on air as we are going to be, and
> that even if we could cut the risk associated with air in half, that risk
would still
> be infinitesimally small.
Before someone (like Bob :-) discovers the obvious mistake, let me correct
myself: I meant to say "the GAIN IN SAFETY would still be infinitesimally
small".
Bjorn
http://www.bjornjensen.com