HP3000-L Archives

May 2000, Week 3

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Disc I/O on a 989/400
From:
"Stigers, Greg [And]" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Stigers, Greg [And]
Date:
Tue, 16 May 2000 12:07:25 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines) 
X-no-Archive:yes
Great idea! I believe that one can get STORE to similarly use CPUs by
storing in parallel to a storeset, assuming multiple tape drives. The manual
recommends using using one less tape drive than you have CPUs, so in your
case, three tape drives.

Greg Stigers
http://www.cgiusa.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Terry Warns [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Monday, April 10, 2000 8:58 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Disc I/O on a 989/400

<snip>
If you
have a multithreaded backup like RoadRunner or Orbit's backup.  Run as many
processes as possible, how is your CPU? How is your IO.
<snip>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2