LOL! With your permission, I'll incorporate that formula in my next UW
Photography course, and on the website :-)

Bjorn
http://www.bjornjensen.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: SouthEast US Scuba Diving Travel list
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Esat Atikkan
> Sent: 31 May, 2000 18:48
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [SCUBA-SE] Re-Introduction
>
>
> Ah! The rarity of subject issue.
>
> The formula tends to B
>
> quality*(rarity + usability) > rejection threshold
>
> When rarity of subject &/or potential use variables R
> high, some w/ low Q R retained.
>
> Amazing how one can justify such things.
>
>
> Safe bubbles
> Esat Atikkan
>
>
>
>
> --- Bjorn Vang Jensen <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> > Quinn wrote:
> >
> > > Yes new w/ a camera UW, but not above. As you so
> > aptly demonstrate on your
> > > site, basic photographic principles are the same,
> > only a few things are
> > > different, such as light travel, DOF, subject
> > distance, etc. Been at it a
> > > while on the surface.  My images are coming along
> > nicely, but not too many
> > > keepers yet. I am a ruthless editor of my own
> > work.
> >
> > A very sound principle, but so difficult to
> > implement, especially when you
> > are sitting with a picture of something rare (for
> > you at any rate), and it
> > is ever-so-slightly out of focus :-)
> >
> > Bjorn
> > http://www.bjornjensen.com
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Send instant messages & get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger.
> http://im.yahoo.com/
>