HP3000-L Archives

April 2000, Week 1

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Carl McNamee <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Carl McNamee <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 7 Apr 2000 09:00:32 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
This is a cross post from the EMC list server:

A bit of back ground and a summary of our problem. We have a 3700 frame that
is about 60% full of 23GB drives. The drives are split into 4.6GB logical
partitions. We assigned drives to the controllers based on HP's
recommendation of no more than 8-10 drives for performance since we have
some very i/o intensive applications.
My problem is that all 32 controllers all "full", e.g. have 8-10 drives
assigned, but the emc box is only half full of drives. What I am interested
in is how many drives you have assigned to each controller?
HP's theory on the 8-10 drives deals with an optimal number of spindles, if
I'm not mistaken. Since a logical emc drive does not necessarily equate to a
spindle we are thinking about stringing the drives out 15-20 per controller
so that we can fill the frame with drives. In our theory we would just need
to ensure that we did not exceed the capacity of the f/w scsi channel during
peak processing. I think that this can be done by arranging the drives so
that we have a good mix of low use drives and high use drives on each
controller.
Any thoughts or comments? Feel free to poke holes in this!
Carl McNamee
Systems Administrator
Billing Concepts

ATOM RSS1 RSS2