Netbase works well once you've got the initial setup done.  However, the
setup is tedious as hell and doesn't allow for much error.

Jesse


Jeffrey Kubler <[log in to unmask]> wrote in message
news:F4B1826B1A21D211AEC5006008207AF404378119@dogbert.csillc.com...
> Alan,
> I believe you will find 3 products on the map for this type of
replication.
> The Quest product (NETBASE) is by far the most prominent.  Lund has a tool
> it took over from Carolian called Shadow and there is a third called
> BackChat?  I have experience with the first two.  The NETBASE has the most
> functionality altough my understanding is that Lund is working on
> enhancements to make the Shadow product on par with NETBASE.  One drawback
> (or it could be an advantage) is that Shadow relies upon image logging.
You
> will find NETBASE in numerous installations. Shadow hadn't been
aggressively
> marketed so most of its sights are older, but steady (and proud of it!).
I
> don't know that much about Backchat.
> Thanks,
> Jeff Kubler
> Kubler Consulting,Inc.
> >From: "Heter, Alan" <[log in to unmask]>
> >Reply-To: "Heter, Alan" <[log in to unmask]>
> >To: [log in to unmask]
> >Subject: Data Replication
> >Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2000 08:28:18 -0700
> >
> >I am currently working on a project that will require data replication
> >software.  I would like to hear testimonials of good or bad of
experiences
> >with different software packages.  We are currently evaluating QUEST
> >NetBase
> >Shadowing, among other alternatives.  Has anyone using this package
noticed
> >significant impacts on performance? If you would like to take this off
list
> >feel free to email me at the address below.
> >
> >Alan Heter
> >Senior Programmer Analyst - Information Systems
> >Alliant Foodservice - Minneapolis
> >2864 Eagandale Boulevard
> >Eagan, MN 55121
> >(651) 683-4206
> >(651) 683-4438 fax
> >e-mail: [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>
> ______________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>