HP3000-L Archives

March 2000, Week 3

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Eric H. Sand" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Eric H. Sand
Date:
Fri, 17 Mar 2000 16:05:30 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines)
Hi Tom,
    Please refer to a response I gave on this listserv re labeled tapes
awhile ago.

    http://raven.utc.edu/cgi-bin/WA.EXE?A2=ind9811A&L=hp3000-l&P=R13568

                             Eric Sand
                             [log in to unmask]


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Brandt [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Friday, March 17, 2000 4:42 AM
> To:   [log in to unmask]
> Subject:      Re: FCOPY and Tapes
>
> At 07:30 PM 03/16/00 -0500, Tom wrote:
> >If they are reading the tape on an IBM system, it may be missing the
> >Tape Label. There's an option on either the FCOPY or the FILE statement
> >to place an IBM-format label on the tape ahead of the Data.
>
> It's been a long time since I had to move tapes between 3000s and IBMs,
> but
> I thought (and could very well be wrong) that HP systems could only read,
> not write IBM tape labels.  3000s can both read and wite ANSI labels.
>
> Tom Brandt
> Northtech Systems, Inc.
> http://www.northtech.com

ATOM RSS1 RSS2