HP3000-L Archives

February 2000, Week 4

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Stigers, Greg [And]" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Stigers, Greg [And]
Date:
Wed, 23 Feb 2000 18:32:07 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
X-no-Archive:yes
Is that a restriction on benchmarking applications on platforms? Because
Oracle is represented on the TPC site, for instance, at
http://www.tpc.org/new_result/ttperf.idc. Now, if only HP would allow us to
port their TPC-C benchmark code from the 9000 (ninth on that list, running
Sybase Adaptive Server Enterprise 12.0 for the RDBMS) to the 3000...

Greg Stigers
http://www.cgiusa.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Gambrell [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2000 10:45 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Oracle and the e3000

Remember, Oracle won't let you make claims about performance or do
benchmarking to compare platforms.  However, HP could promote using the
satisfied customer approach.

If Oracle server were priced per user independent of the MPE user license,
like I believe it is on every other Oracle platform, it would probably
help it's sales on MPE a lot, too!

Richard
<snip>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2