HP3000-L Archives

February 2000, Week 4

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Performance ratings for the HP e3000
From:
47u <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
47u <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 26 Feb 2000 01:05:01 GMT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (12 lines) 
Carl is correct.  The revised performance numbers for the 9x8 and 9x9
families were issued a while back.  The only changes for 6.5 are at
the high end (989/650, 997/800 and up).

Kevin Cooper
CSY Performance
[log in to unmask]

Carl McNamee ([log in to unmask]) wrote:
: If I am not mistaken HP changed to a new performance measurment scheme
: sometime late last year.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2