HP3000-L Archives

February 2000, Week 4

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Performance ratings for the HP e3000
From:
Jerry Fochtman <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Jerry Fochtman <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 25 Feb 2000 10:03:27 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines) 
At 07:41 AM 2/25/2000 -0800, John Burke wrote:
>Anyone else notice that in addition to a new name, many of the existing HP
>3000 models seem to have gotten a little performance rating boost?

The performance rating changes *may* be due to the new, 6.5 release of
MPE/iX and the extensive performance tuning HP did in this release.

/jf
                               _\\///_
                              (' o-o ')
___________________________ooOo_( )_OOoo____________________________________

                          Friday, February 25th
                        (A sad day indeed.... ;-)

           Today in 1913 - 16th Amendment setting up the income
                           tax was proclaimed.

___________________________________Oooo_____________________________________
                             oooO  (    )
                            (    )  )  /
                             \  (   (_/
                              \_)

ATOM RSS1 RSS2